"July is a blind date with summer", Happy July! @TRY3STEPS.COM
Dear Reader, If you use TRY3STEPS a lot, this message is for you. This incredible nonprofit organization helps the world with answers. We love you, we share answers. Your love helps us thrive. The more we give, the more we have! Thank you for inspiring us. (Secure PayPal)

*Everything counts! No minimum transaction limit!
Stay Updated with the World! Subscribe Now:: YouTube.com/c/Try3Steps
Say Hello to Try3Steps Group! Join Now:: GoogleGroup@Try3Steps

Search Another Question

Showing posts with label prolific. Show all posts
Showing posts with label prolific. Show all posts

Sep 4, 2019

[Answer] How many children did the most prolific mother ever give birth to?

Step 1 : Introduction to the question "How many children did the most prolific mother ever give birth to?"



...1. 27 2. 38 3. 53 4. 69

Nov 16, 2018

[Answer] 3. One of the greatest and most prolific science fiction writers in history, this man famously created the Three Laws of Robotics in 1941.

Step 1 : Introduction to the question "3. One of the greatest and most prolific science fiction writers in history, this man famously created the Three Laws of Robotics in 1941."



...1. Arthur C. Clarke 2. Douglas Adams 3. Robert A. Heinlein 4. Isaac Asimov The three laws appear in the short story, "Runaround", and are as follows: 1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws. For many years, these laws have been part of the philosophical debate regarding the ever increasing intelligence and autonomy of robots. The story itself centers on a robot that is forced into indecision because of the way in which the laws are programmed. The robot, Robot SPD-13 ("Speedy"), is unable to decide whether to follow the orders of a human (2nd law) or avoid a potentially destructive hazard (3rd law). In the end, one of the humans must risk his life, forcing the 1st law to override the others.