Step 1 : Introduction to the question "3. Grandpa Louis has been at the blackjack table all day. He lost every hand and is down $10,000. Since he's lost so much, he's sure to start winning again soon."
...1. Appeal to ignorance 2. Gambler's fallacy 3. Appeal to authority 4. Post hoc ergo propter hoc The gambler's fallacy is a causal fallacy where one believes that independent events are actually related. For example: The overall probability of flipping a coin and it landing on heads is 0.5. Say you flipped five tails in a row. Someone using the gambler's fallacy would think that the next flip would have to be heads. However, each flip has a 0.5 chance of landing on either side, so the probability of the coin landing on heads is no more likely than it landing on tails. Each flip is an independent act.
Step 2 : Answer to the question "3. Grandpa Louis has been at the blackjack table all day. He lost every hand and is down $10,000. Since he's lost so much, he's sure to start winning again soon."
Gambler's fallacy:
Please let us know as comment, if the answer is not correct!
Step 3 : Disclaimer & Terms of Use regarding the question "3. Grandpa Louis has been at the blackjack table all day. He lost every hand and is down $10,000. Since he's lost so much, he's sure to start winning again soon."
Our machine learning tool trying its best to find the relevant answer to your question. Now its your turn, "The more we share The more we have". Share our work with whom you care, along with your comment ...Kindly check our comments section, Sometimes our tool may wrong but not our users.
Are We Wrong To Think We're Right? Then Give Right Answer Below As Comment
No comments:
Post a Comment